Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39B52186C7 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5964 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2016 00:24:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5438 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2016 00:24:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 5372 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2016 00:24:06 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:24:06 +0000 Received: from [10.22.10.167] (unknown [192.175.27.10]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 979231A008B; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli In-Reply-To: <2F9B8811-8240-454A-8599-64BE4B15CE2F@apache.org> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 17:24:05 -0700 Cc: "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7CCEC640-5BCA-4ECC-976B-8630F4C0DD72@apache.org> References: <0C22896E-D77B-4DE4-99A2-9D81E150779C@hortonworks.com> <49120AE6-98D9-4CC2-A6A6-4C322A25F1D6@apache.org> <2A5F3F89-C79B-42BD-98AC-246CF33D4C47@apache.org> <33E01D1B-C416-464F-8E18-0B368A52DFF3@apache.org> <4B44247B-AFB2-4803-BDB0-251A8270F98C@apache.org> <2F9B8811-8240-454A-8599-64BE4B15CE2F@apache.org> To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) We are not converging - there=E2=80=99s still 58 more. I need help from = the community in addressing / review 2.8.0 blockers. If folks can start = with reviewing Patch available tickets, that=E2=80=99ll be great. Thanks +Vinod > On Apr 4, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli = wrote: >=20 > Here we go again. The blocker / critical tickets ballooned up a lot, I = see 64 now! : https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=3D12334985 >=20 > Also, the docs target (mvn package -Pdocs -DskipTests) is completely = busted on branch-2, I figured I have to backport a whole bunch of = patches that are only on trunk, and may be more fixes on top of that = *sigh* >=20 > I=E2=80=99ll start pushing for progress for an RC in a week or two. >=20 > Any help towards this, reviewing/committing outstanding patches and = contributing to open items is greatly appreciated. >=20 > Thanks > +Vinod >=20 >> On Feb 9, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli = wrote: >>=20 >> Sure. The last time I checked, there were 20 odd blocker/critical = tickets too that=E2=80=99ll need some of my time. >>=20 >> Given that, if you can get them in before a week, we should be good. >>=20 >> +Vinod >>=20 >>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Subramaniam V K = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Vinod, >>>=20 >>> Thanks for initiating the 2.8 release thread. We are in late review = stages >>> for YARN-4420 (Add REST API for listing reservations) and YARN-2575 = (Adding >>> ACLs for reservation system), hoping to get them by next week. Any = chance >>> you can put off cutting 2.8 by a week as we are planning to deploy >>> ReservationSystem and these are critical for that? >>>=20 >>> Cheers, >>> Subru >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Chris Nauroth = >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> FYI, I've just needed to raise HDFS-9761 to blocker status for the = 2.8.0 >>>> release. >>>>=20 >>>> --Chris Nauroth >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On 2/3/16, 6:19 PM, "Karthik Kambatla" wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks Vinod. Not labeling 2.8.0 stable sounds perfectly = reasonable to me. >>>>> Let us not call it alpha or beta though, it is quite confusing. :) >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Gangumalla, Uma = >>>>=20 >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks Vinod. +1 for 2.8 release start. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Uma >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On 2/3/16, 3:53 PM, "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli" = >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Seems like all the features listed in the Roadmap wiki are in. = I=C2=B9m >>>>>> going >>>>>>> to try cutting an RC this weekend for a first/non-stable release = off of >>>>>>> branch-2.8. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Let me know if anyone has any objections/concerns. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Branch-2.8 is created. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> As mentioned before, the goal on branch-2.8 is to put = improvements / >>>>>>>> fixes to existing features with a goal of converging on an = alpha >>>>>> release >>>>>>>> soon. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Forking threads now in order to track all things related to = the >>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Creating the branch now. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I think we=C2=B9ve converged at a high level w.r.t 2.8. And = as I just >>>>>> sent >>>>>>>>>> out an email, I updated the Roadmap wiki reflecting the same: >>>>>>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I plan to create a 2.8 branch EOD today. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> The goal for all of us should be to restrict improvements & = fixes >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> only (a) the feature-set documented under 2.8 in the RoadMap = wiki >>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> (b) other minor features that are already in 2.8. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>>>>>>> > = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> - Cut a branch about two weeks from now >>>>>>>>>>> - Do an RC mid next month (leaving ~4weeks since branch-cut) >>>>>>>>>>> - As with 2.7.x series, the first release will still be = called as >>>>>>>>>>> early / alpha release in the interest of >>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=B9 gaining downstream adoption >>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=B9 wider testing, >>>>>>>>>>> =E2=80=B9 yet reserving our right to fix any inadvertent >>>>>> incompatibilities >>>>>>>>>>> introduced. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>=20 >=20