Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 885521819F for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7316 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2016 19:51:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6710 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2016 19:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 6669 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2016 19:51:07 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:51:07 +0000 Received: from [10.22.10.167] (unknown [192.175.27.10]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 59C841A0379; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:51:07 -0800 Cc: "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4B44247B-AFB2-4803-BDB0-251A8270F98C@apache.org> References: <0C22896E-D77B-4DE4-99A2-9D81E150779C@hortonworks.com> <49120AE6-98D9-4CC2-A6A6-4C322A25F1D6@apache.org> <2A5F3F89-C79B-42BD-98AC-246CF33D4C47@apache.org> <33E01D1B-C416-464F-8E18-0B368A52DFF3@apache.org> To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Sure. The last time I checked, there were 20 odd blocker/critical = tickets too that=E2=80=99ll need some of my time. Given that, if you can get them in before a week, we should be good. +Vinod > On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Subramaniam V K = wrote: >=20 > Vinod, >=20 > Thanks for initiating the 2.8 release thread. We are in late review = stages > for YARN-4420 (Add REST API for listing reservations) and YARN-2575 = (Adding > ACLs for reservation system), hoping to get them by next week. Any = chance > you can put off cutting 2.8 by a week as we are planning to deploy > ReservationSystem and these are critical for that? >=20 > Cheers, > Subru >=20 > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Chris Nauroth = > wrote: >=20 >> FYI, I've just needed to raise HDFS-9761 to blocker status for the = 2.8.0 >> release. >>=20 >> --Chris Nauroth >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 2/3/16, 6:19 PM, "Karthik Kambatla" wrote: >>=20 >>> Thanks Vinod. Not labeling 2.8.0 stable sounds perfectly reasonable = to me. >>> Let us not call it alpha or beta though, it is quite confusing. :) >>>=20 >>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Gangumalla, Uma = >>=20 >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Thanks Vinod. +1 for 2.8 release start. >>>>=20 >>>> Regards, >>>> Uma >>>>=20 >>>> On 2/3/16, 3:53 PM, "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli" >>>> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Seems like all the features listed in the Roadmap wiki are in. = I=C2=B9m >>>> going >>>>> to try cutting an RC this weekend for a first/non-stable release = off of >>>>> branch-2.8. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Let me know if anyone has any objections/concerns. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks >>>>> +Vinod >>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Branch-2.8 is created. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> As mentioned before, the goal on branch-2.8 is to put = improvements / >>>>>> fixes to existing features with a goal of converging on an alpha >>>> release >>>>>> soon. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Forking threads now in order to track all things related to the >>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Creating the branch now. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> I think we=C2=B9ve converged at a high level w.r.t 2.8. And as = I just >>>> sent >>>>>>>> out an email, I updated the Roadmap wiki reflecting the same: >>>>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Roadmap >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> I plan to create a 2.8 branch EOD today. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> The goal for all of us should be to restrict improvements & = fixes >>>> to >>>>>>>> only (a) the feature-set documented under 2.8 in the RoadMap = wiki >>>> and >>>>>>>> (b) other minor features that are already in 2.8. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> +Vinod >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>>>>>>> > = wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> - Cut a branch about two weeks from now >>>>>>>>> - Do an RC mid next month (leaving ~4weeks since branch-cut) >>>>>>>>> - As with 2.7.x series, the first release will still be called = as >>>>>>>>> early / alpha release in the interest of >>>>>>>>> =E2=80=B9 gaining downstream adoption >>>>>>>>> =E2=80=B9 wider testing, >>>>>>>>> =E2=80=B9 yet reserving our right to fix any inadvertent >>>> incompatibilities >>>>>>>>> introduced. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>=20 >>=20