Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D69A9175B8 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14885 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2015 23:22:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14651 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2015 23:22:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14607 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2015 23:22:40 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 23:22:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 668F21A0A6B; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:22:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.901 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HqOxQu6Cwg_m; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0626143B03; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so6915495igb.0; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=X34Yk8L7YOydJ/6vX2n5T6y0COe7Ztp2wFMHZD/4vEM=; b=CKI/NfOmR2HWqUbyJbD0sfvabed7j8tfxJSx9UwYzd+Mc8AOmz9rGHsr/2+8H1og1P 1JzcKEBITj6bF4RMk+BPdQG0+lf4b1U19hJVGGoKwMDjz/WAYsJpIu/C8voZAMiifES3 NHqP6ieDkxQY3+nSXNHViCWLWHcCTkcrDCA6mE/TzLnVXW9Wstf8FOSoW1sghYq4F5bS AzKdPwgSvX1/DpmgdGWsPp3LaDO1Y//VKxYmVoJ+kMQPmxVN8FHVp5Ch3bz8YiOrudzg UeivSYeIJRdDSf0WO12JEPpMPjV60J4jpLS0HtsdHck3JqhuhI4/E0zvAK/nqh2wPgPf 09gQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.2.99 with SMTP id 3mr689943igt.1.1441840940974; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.32.225 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:22:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15B9DA1D-FB0A-434C-8823-2404A3215AA7@hortonworks.com> References: <8AD4EE147886274A8B495D6AF407DF698124E8DA@szxeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5552E33F.8040502@oss.nttdata.co.jp> <8AD4EE147886274A8B495D6AF407DF6981CDD5F9@szxeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <33E1A54B-22AE-4214-9F26-97EFE33DBB3C@hortonworks.com> <6335EE2F-15A0-41F0-8FA2-D397E2DF54E5@hortonworks.com> <944F00D7-88B2-46FE-BD92-AC4FD06B2125@hortonworks.com> <55AE0DC5.4000001@oss.nttdata.co.jp> <40D02015-C0F6-4AE6-B871-E03EA8368EBF@hortonworks.com> <1438804608163.61990@hortonworks.com> <15B9DA1D-FB0A-434C-8823-2404A3215AA7@hortonworks.com> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:22:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release From: Nikhil To: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: Hadoop Common , "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "vinayakumarb@apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122e6e81c192e051f58c13d --089e0122e6e81c192e051f58c13d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Vinod, I am wondering if there is any news on 2.6.1 release. Any dates planned for the release? Nikhil On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote: > To clarify, there is already a branch-2.6.1 created separately. So, if you > want something in 2.6.2, you can continue putting it in branch-2.6. > > But no 2.6.1 related commits please. > > Thanks > +Vinod > > > On Aug 14, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < > vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > > Everyone, > > > > Please stop committing to 2.6.1 (branch-2.6 or branch-2.6.1), we have a > fairly elaborate parallel release-process going on for 2.6.1 (with me / > Akira and Sangjin participating offline) and any outside cherry-picks are > going to disrupt our progress. > > > > If you want something added to 2.6.1, please post it in the mailing > lists and we will consider it. > > > > Thanks. > > +Vinod > > > >> On Aug 14, 2015, at 12:17 AM, Vinayakumar B > wrote: > >> > >> FYI, Some of the issues in > >> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes are already > >> merged in 2.6.1. > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Vinay > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > >> > >>> HDFS-8850 is a fix > for > >>> VolumeScanner which was added to 2.7 (HDFS-7430 > >>> ). I don't see it > >>> applicable to 2.6. Could you please confirm? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Sangjin > >>> > >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Sean Busbey > wrote: > >>> > >>>> If we haven't frozen yet, HDFS-8850 is a straight forward fix that is > >>>> currently only in 2.8+ and would benefit 2.6 and 2.7. > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Junping Du > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I would like to nominate YARN-3832 as 2.6.1 candidate which is > critical > >>>>> and I also saw it happened recently on a 2.6.0 cluster. Hope this is > >>> not > >>>>> too late. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Junping > >>>>> ________________________________________ > >>>>> From: Rich Haase > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 1:52 AM > >>>>> To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org > >>>>> Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > >>>>> Subject: Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 to add those fixes. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Rich Haase | Sr. Software Engineer | Pandora > >>>>> m 303.887.1146 | rhaase@pandora.com > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 8/5/15, 11:42 AM, "Wangda Tan" wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Can we add following two fixes to 2.6.1? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2922 and > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3487. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> They're not fatal issue, but they can cause lots of issue in a large > >>>>>> cluster. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Wangda > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Sangjin Lee > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> See my later update in the thread. HDFS-7704 is in the list. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Sangjin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < > >>>>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Makes sense, it was caused by HDFS-7704 which got into 2.7.0 only > >>>> and > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>> not part of the candidate list. Removed HDFS-7916 from the list. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> +Vinod > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Sangjin Lee > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Out of the JIRAs we proposed, please remove HDFS-7916. I don't > >>>>>>> think it > >>>>>>>>> applies to 2.6. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> Sangjin > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Sean > >>>> > >>> > > > > --089e0122e6e81c192e051f58c13d--