Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 812C418619 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62163 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2015 11:38:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62083 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2015 11:38:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62072 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2015 11:38:49 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:38:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 262F7C0041 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:38:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.999 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=1.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cyN2P6ltyYVY for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relayvx12c.securemail.intermedia.net (relayvx12c.securemail.intermedia.net [64.78.52.187]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8D10742BB4 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from securemail.intermedia.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by emg-ca-1-2.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7716653E20 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: CHANGES.TXT MIME-Version: 1.0 x-echoworx-msg-id: ca0168ef-9819-46cd-8d8b-7edcddda8495 x-echoworx-emg-received: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:38:33.443 -0700 x-echoworx-action: delivered Received: from 10.254.155.17 ([10.254.155.17]) by emg-ca-1-2 (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.2) with SMTP ID 365 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-1.exch080.serverpod.net (unknown [10.224.117.101]) by emg-ca-1-2.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D9853E20 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-2.exch080.serverpod.net (10.224.117.102) by MBX080-W4-CO-1.exch080.serverpod.net (10.224.117.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:38:31 -0700 Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-2.exch080.serverpod.net ([10.224.117.102]) by mbx080-w4-co-2.exch080.serverpod.net ([10.224.117.102]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 04:38:31 -0700 From: Steve Loughran To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Thread-Topic: CHANGES.TXT Thread-Index: AQHQ7YVS/J6szVNJVUmZE5WJ1t11T545u72AgAAAfICAAQ+BAA== Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:38:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1B31002F-849F-4E3E-93D9-E9A0B132E759@hortonworks.com> References: <93DFD6C7-88E6-4665-9280-3191EC92552F@hortonworks.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [31.53.131.2] x-source-routing-agent: Processed Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On 12 Sep 2015, at 20:26, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Sep 12, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Sep 12, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Steve Loughran wr= ote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> 2. go to JIRA-generated change logs. Though for that to be reliable, th= ose fix-version fields have to be 100% accurate too. >=20 >=20 > P.S., https://github.com/aw-altiscale/eco-release-metadata/blob/master/HA= DOOP/README.md >=20 >=20 nice. I'd prefer this, as long as we keep up on the versioning. In particul= ar, any cherry picking back to a point release, 2.7.2 etc will need the ent= ry being re-edited in the meantime, I celebrate Haohui's volunteering -though need to warn it = was the thought of making the 2.7.x and 2.6.x changes consistent which worr= ied me there -you end up having to re-arrange entries across four files -steve