hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release
Date Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:49:27 GMT
Just for the completeness, the following JIRAs have already been committed
to branch-2.6 and thus will be part of 2.6.1:

HADOOP-11307
YARN-2375
HDFS-7425
HDFS-4882
HDFS-7489
HDFS-7503
HDFS-7443
HDFS-3443
HADOOP-11466
HDFS-7733
MAPREDUCE-6237
YARN-3251
HDFS-6153 reverted


On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Akira.
>
> I'd like to make one small correction. If we're getting HDFS-7704, then we
> should also get HDFS-7916. My earlier comment was assuming HDFS-7704 was
> not included in the list. But if is (and I think it should), then we should
> also get HDFS-7916 as it addresses an important issue related to HDFS-7704.
> Hope it makes it clear.
>
> Sangjin
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Akira AJISAKA <
> ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Joep and your team members for creating the list. I really
>> appreciate your work. I looked your 'not yet marked with 2.6.1-candidate'
>> list and categorized them.
>>
>> 1) Now marked as 2.6.1-candidate and I agree with you to keep it marked.
>>
>> * HDFS-7213
>> * HDFS-7788
>> * HDFS-7884
>> * HDFS-7930
>> * YARN-2856
>> * YARN-3222
>> * YARN-3238
>> * YARN-3464
>> * YARN-3526
>> * YARN-3850
>>
>> Thanks Sangjin for creating patches for branch-2.6.
>>
>> 2) Not yet marked as 2.6.1-candidate that I'd like to see in 2.6.1
>>
>> * HDFS-7182
>> * HDFS-7314
>> * HDFS-7704
>> * HDFS-7894
>> * HDFS-7929 and HDFS-8480 (they are related)
>> * HDFS-7980
>> * HDFS-8245
>> * HDFS-8270
>> * HDFS-8404
>> * HDFS-8486
>> * MAPREDUCE-5465
>> * MAPREDUCE-5649
>> * MAPREDUCE-6166
>> * MAPREDUCE-6238
>> * MAPREDUCE-6300
>> * YARN-2952
>> * YARN-2997
>> * YARN-3094
>> * YARN-3176 (to be fixed soon, I think)
>> * YARN-3231
>> * HADOOP-11295
>> * HADOOP-11812
>>
>> 3) Not yet marked as 2.6.1-candidate. I'd like to drop
>>
>> * HDFS-7281 (incompatible change)
>> * HDFS-7446 (this looks to be an improvement)
>> * HDFS-7916 (cannot apply to branch-2.6 as Sangjin mentioned)
>>
>> Hi Vinod, could you mark the issues in 2) as 2.6.1-candidate?
>>
>> I'd like to freeze the candidate list in about 7 days and start
>> backporting them. Do you have any thoughts?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Akira
>>
>>
>> On 7/25/15 10:32, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Out of the JIRAs we proposed, please remove HDFS-7916. I don't think it
>>> applies to 2.6.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sangjin
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I’ve added them all to the 2.6.1-candidate list. I included everything
>>>> even though some of them are major tickets. The list is getting large,
>>>> we
>>>> will have to cut these down once we get down to the next phase of
>>>> figuring
>>>> out what to include and what not to.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 2:15 AM, Akira AJISAKA <ajisakaa@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Vinod for updating the candidate list.
>>>>> I'd like to include the followings 12 JIRAs:
>>>>>
>>>>> * YARN-3641
>>>>> * YARN-3585
>>>>> * YARN-2910
>>>>> * HDFS-8431
>>>>> * HDFS-7830
>>>>> * HDFS-7763
>>>>> * HDFS-7742
>>>>> * HDFS-7235
>>>>> * HDFS-7225
>>>>> * MAPREDUCE-6324
>>>>> * HADOOP-11934
>>>>> * HADOOP-11491
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Akira
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/18/15 11:13, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   - I also have a bunch of patches that I’d like to include, will
>>>>>> update
>>>>>>
>>>>> them right away.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’ve just finished this. The latest 2.6.1-candidate list is up
at 64
>>>>>>
>>>>> JIRAs.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Others, please look at the list and post anything else you’d like
to
>>>>>>
>>>>> get included for 2.6.1.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 15, 2015, at 6:24 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>>>>
>>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<mailto:vinodkv@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alright, I’d like to make progress while the issue is hot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I created a label to discuss on the candidate list of patches:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.6.1-candidate
>>>> <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20=%202.6.1-candidate
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Next steps, I’ll do the following
>>>>>>   - Review 2.7 and 2.8 blocker/critical tickets and see what makes
>>>>>> sense
>>>>>>
>>>>> for 2.6.1 and add as candidates
>>>>
>>>>>   - I haven’t reviewed the current list yet, the seed list is from
this
>>>>>>
>>>>> email thread. Will review them.
>>>>
>>>>>   - I also have a bunch of patches that I’d like to include, will
>>>>>> update
>>>>>>
>>>>> them right away.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Others, please look at the current list and let me know what else
>>>>>> you’d
>>>>>>
>>>>> like to include.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’d like to keep this ‘candidate-collection’ cycle’ for a
max of a
>>>>>> week
>>>>>>
>>>>> and then start the release process. @Akira, let’s sync up offline on
>>>> how to
>>>> take this forward in terms of the release process.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message