Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of vinodkv@hortonworks.com
 designates 64.78.56.46 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: 2.7 status
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@hortonworks.com>
To: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
CC: Hadoop Common <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>, "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org"
	<yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org>, "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org"
	<hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Thread-Topic: 2.7 status
Thread-Index: 
 AQHQRWiGhyjMfFXaoUmLLXKnmK5vX5zvSp+AgBjZ7iuAAIrVgIAGaj2AgAUBIQCAAAVygIAaAqoAgAAf7ICACBt3AIADamiAgAwJ2AA=
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:35:42 +0000
Message-ID: <1D5A1D3A-2DE5-4C82-995F-DFA8F62E9657@hortonworks.com>
References: 
 <CADbBEntTXUUPC8BFtp2vMxcOB6tkitW-u2fQhyu6N5Hj29H_-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <2059746485.2654630.1423843863610.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <1425239010159.37330@hortonworks.com>	<1425239892312.98627@hortonworks.com>
 <FF213988-24B1-4AC7-93C6-D0FAB817877E@hortonworks.com>
 <EF4A6149-6D07-42AF-88A7-0E73CB83E152@hortonworks.com>
 <9CE562F2-4F15-4BC7-887E-B2B50EF0050A@hortonworks.com>
 <9D8E213F-6DEB-4670-B7FB-EEC589410AA9@hortonworks.com>
 <CAKtuutHykbXJvfcphGs4hmPvirt0898RceB4UjooU+Lctp+DqQ@mail.gmail.com>,<8A4E85C4-BD3A-48F8-86AD-82349DC7602B@hortonworks.com>
 <1427942721034.33721@hortonworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <1427942721034.33721@hortonworks.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <D343AC391C8967408357FE7F08438238@exch080.serverpod.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Seems like they are already in, nothing more to do here..

+Vinod

On Apr 1, 2015, at 7:45 PM, Zhijie Shen <zshen@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Can we include YARN-3273 into 2.7? YARN-3430 needs it to fix the RM web U=
I bug.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Zhijie
> ________________________________________
> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@hortonworks.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 3:35 PM
> To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Cc: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Common
> Subject: Re: 2.7 status
>=20
> This is the filter I am using: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?fil=
ter=3D12330598
>=20
> +Vinod
>=20
> On Mar 25, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Konstantin Shvachko <shv.hadoop@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> Progress is good!
>> What are the four blockers?
>> Could you please mark them as such in the Jira.
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>> --Konst
>>=20
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Progress has been really slow, but now we are down to four blockers acr=
oss
>>> the board.
>>>=20
>>> I plan to roll an RC this weekend.
>>>=20
>>> Thanks,
>>> +Vinod
>>>=20
>>> On Mar 8, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> 2.7 branch created and branch-2 updated to point to 2.8-SNAPSHOT.
>>>>=20
>>>> Committers, please exercise caution on the content going into
>>> branch-2.7. I'd take help everyone's help in pushing through the remain=
ing
>>> set of blockers targeted for 2.7.
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>=20
>>>> On Mar 8, 2015, at 8:21 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> Branching 2.7 now. Request holding off commits to branch-2 to avoid
>>> commit race. Will send an all-clear in the next 30 mins once I am done.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> The 2.7 blocker JIRA went down and going back up again, we will need
>>> to converge.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Unless I see objections, I plan to cut a branch this weekend and
>>> selectively filter stuff in after that in the interest of convergence.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Thoughts welcome!
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On Mar 1, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Arun Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com> wrote=
:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Sounds good, thanks for the help Vinod!
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>>> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 11:43 AM
>>>>>>> To: Hadoop Common; Jason Lowe; Arun Murthy
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: 2.7 status
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Agreed. How about we roll an RC end of this week? As a Java 7+
>>> release with features, patches that already got in?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Here's a filter tracking blocker tickets -
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=3D12330598. Nine open now=
.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> +Arun
>>>>>>> Arun, I'd like to help get 2.7 out without further delay. Do you mi=
nd
>>> me taking over release duties?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>>> From: Jason Lowe <jlowe@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>
>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:11 AM
>>>>>>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: 2.7 status
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> I'd like to see a 2.7 release sooner than later.  It has been almos=
t
>>> 3 months since Hadoop 2.6 was released, and there have already been 634
>>> JIRAs committed to 2.7.  That's a lot of changes waiting for an officia=
l
>>> release.
>>>>>>>=20
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=3Dproject%20in%20%28hadoop%2=
Chdfs%2Cyarn%2Cmapreduce%29%20AND%20fixversion%3D2.7.0%20AND%20resolution%3=
DFixed
>>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> From: Sangjin Lee <sjlee@apache.org>
>>>>>>> To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 1:30 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: 2.7 status
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> What is the current status of the 2.7 release? I know initially it
>>> started
>>>>>>> out as a "java-7" only release, but looking at the JIRAs that is ve=
ry
>>> much
>>>>>>> not the case.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Do we have a certain timeframe for 2.7 or is it time to discuss it?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Sangjin
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20