Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D1C711444 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59202 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2014 19:27:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59119 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2014 19:27:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 59107 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2014 19:27:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:27:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rarecactus@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.173] (HELO mail-wi0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:27:28 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id cc10so3250297wib.6 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 12:27:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=j/ekTkN0thcbsl8yh7tDIZky+j3axeCW2qB5GHhLBzQ=; b=E+h6QGW92DWb4jTXzYmO/cPUpKMI9O2Caztf+KxtF8qPVF2Z3dlWhqi/43sAL7rS2o 7zWuCy5jkwOhpYTfjWV7UuCydi6NizJinHalVYYHXkDxWFyaej9QPMBWQCf+kxNWICbF ewF3BdmeeHAnkGCCj/3ioOHJ2rVNP2K9dfomnwcK1jYFJ2fQTgL/0EUUCxxnpM1wIXj+ udMuB1rguSRF47F20JvRTPPt+GRkMLSsZwEZKkBdYL2sf9CF/qQE4vLpno03ipT8mhXa jtEKxlMrkpj31yf7cZLngogRBCJJkK4ckPtvJAKGWfCd8ILLZ/L1gO20LFPjeCj56NdL tzVQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.35.134 with SMTP id h6mr25465189wij.0.1410204447454; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 12:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rarecactus@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.28.6 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:27:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:27:27 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 561s0z9cgjjljE-eDXZ5fNE0T98 Message-ID: Subject: Re: migrating private branches to the new git repo From: Colin McCabe To: Hadoop Common Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 for using git log instead of CHANGES.txt. Colin On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: >> Not to derail the conversation, but if CHANGES.txt is making backports more >> annoying, why don't we get rid of it? It seems like we should be able to >> generate it via a JIRA query, and "git log" can also be used for a quick >> check (way faster than svn log). > > +1 > > As long as release notes and incompatible changes are recorded in each > branch, we gain no accuracy by maintaining this manually. Commit > messages that record the merge revisions instead of the change are > similarly hateful. -C