Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFB731057B for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11573 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2014 17:15:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 11445 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2014 17:15:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10257 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2014 17:15:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10254 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jul 2014 17:15:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 10251 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jul 2014 17:15:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:15:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rarecactus@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.172] (HELO mail-we0-f172.google.com) (74.125.82.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:15:54 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x48so4647255wes.31 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:15:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CZdLNn+G1ozTJFYSVGh8mmqYbrhxrvhvx9fNZfidmdI=; b=iO47x6Ayrjm6HG/U2I1fzRSuoy1KhjP95HRqCI5rodGLZSxHY+IifzBdE4juLXMRet 4pqQs0H0CI3IE+bRR9GRhuZg1zzKDaGsjTKIPnh0autFMVqzI90vE7K/r6vq2cIIW4Ca Os/nrc/DH0E3GTK73H/rce6vFo7Tf5QR61iHYWKTdUe8XheKICGaZU8OulEnSfERnYPc zUS2OMbu2bt1uQ+1+6TJRc3nHbX7941sBWLaEwU8YHvdWd36eTLmALv3nCFf7/RzJksM kbRUObAqb34DM5VEZL5ogTGMBpZqq+P2FQbLzdLXQejWHDJak9XDp2tJ92gY1Imw/yzI cQQw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.110.10 with SMTP id hw10mr23679445wjb.81.1406308532588; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rarecactus@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.6.5 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:15:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:15:32 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0FEw0DkPUMncJABlk4a1NcssaiE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Assume Private-Unstable for classes that are not annotated From: Colin McCabe To: "mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Cc: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org, "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" , "yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d870c87996c04ff07b848 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e010d870c87996c04ff07b848 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1. Colin On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > Hi devs > > As you might have noticed, we have several classes and methods in them that > are not annotated at all. This is seldom intentional. Avoiding incompatible > changes to all these classes can be considerable baggage. > > I was wondering if we should add an explicit disclaimer in our > compatibility guide that says, "Classes without annotations are to > considered @Private" > > For methods, is it reasonable to say - "Class members without specific > annotations inherit the annotations of the class"? > > Thanks > Karthik > --089e010d870c87996c04ff07b848--