Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of stevel@hortonworks.com
 designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPn_vTu+jQegmc_VM2jdom2obG3_Ui9Wg577jCOw3a+T3Bmixw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABbyifM02nMVaRpARPqnSeJ8gb5x9WTTy8c18tAfr6Z4tQLy2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJs-t7O2V7EuNeMt0hJN2T8aEUJHgnfTDUaBkJVUFui3ca=Npg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABbyifOGA=c1Ytgx6=iAr-22W7zSXa1DdV1jTVX5BHg+gXe61w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+qbEUMJtkmfoAY1xfWKkKF-Y0FkR6_dybyN5E0+=amYA7WDcg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+4kjVuaByNWshmiYFcA64dvcR3TvxKaUNyJdTnAw6yuqdpdCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO0ccOdEnBH_WFWnE9K=Dg7XYa4Ar0yF7nZe8dG1U6_Em8hNfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPn_vTuHpDrWySH-i1-FxGbYg7d8m-yw14p2T7_ik=ZWa5Keag@mail.gmail.com>
	<92FD1DEAAC387041B70D5237A1BE3A1D0CFC835813@MX33A.corp.emc.com>
	<CAPn_vTs8-mERm2HNO=ZRH9acp=SS-Ax_yh=1SpCPGidNLptkhg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALwhT95HxQ-n83yvM8FdTnoH4zzaEnu8HkpY2ko98k65H7jb4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACBYxKKBv4e1P=YSOX1oEJYRx9yEiDs6Z0zWGSWfEuM3TFohiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO0ccOcB3UU9UPOS5T=pi-Yr8PO4iNAh76rBFq7JSnOCCwad0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+RK=_DA1ME-ZSivD=QfH_o_y1=yg6oW2yg1RpvsZZK11SWmzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPn_vTt1hcp29SWKnwC91Q0D_tTyNFceVXX5_S90cXCLZ91UFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+4kjVs8a_N-d6GnefnL11E0Dogy_Woh-uED7r5U9rWAdm7TwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO0ccOetqOzMkicmC15j2gsJLn5NTA34R6MpGPu2a4uRH0+mKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPn_vTu+jQegmc_VM2jdom2obG3_Ui9Wg577jCOw3a+T3Bmixw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:24:59 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CA+4kjVuiLm135kWa=QE-vRaynrppRuVcqUqipiAQJaGPWityAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Plans of moving towards JDK7 in trunk
From: Steve Loughran <stevel@hortonworks.com>
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1f3dec9137c04f6c01130

--001a11c1f3dec9137c04f6c01130
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 10 April 2014 18:12, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Let's speak less abstractly, are there particular features or new
> dependencies that you would like to contribute (or see contributed) that
> require using the Java 1.7 APIs?  Breaking compat in v2 or rolling a v3
> release are both non-trivial, not something I suspect we'd want to do just
> because it would be, for example, nicer to have a newer version of Jetty.
>

Oddly enough, rolling the web framework is something I'd like to see in a
v3. the shuffle may be off jetty, but webhdfs isn't. Moving up also lets is
reliably switch to servlet API v3

But.. I think we may be able to increment Jetty more without going to
java7, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9650 .

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

--001a11c1f3dec9137c04f6c01130--