hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jagane Sundar <jag...@sundar.org>
Subject RE: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0 planned?
Date Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:53:03 GMT
Hey Arun,

Thanks for the clarification. ('tis not pedantic - seems like good practice..)

Jagane

-----Original Message-----
From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:acm@hortonworks.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 1:46 PM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0 planned?

Apologies for being pedantic: please set the target-version to 1.0.2. The committer/RM set
the fix-version after it's merged into the release branch.

thanks,
Arun

On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Jagane Sundar wrote:

> Thanks, Eli.
> 
> I have uploaded a re-spin of the patch for HADOOP-5836 to the Jira.
> My patch for HADOOP-8136 needs to have this patch for HADOOP-5836 applied first. I will
mark HADOOP-8136 with fixVersion 1.0.2.
> 
> Jagane
> ________________________________________
> From: Eli Collins [eli@cloudera.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:25 AM
> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0 planned?
> 
> Hey Jagane,
> 
> You can target your patches against branch-1.0, and then mark them
> with fixVersion 1.0.2 if you'd like the RM to pull them in for the
> next dot release.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eli
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jagane Sundar <jagane@sundar.org> wrote:
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> I would like to make some enhancements to the s3n driver in branch-1.0.
>> 
>> Specifically, I would like to accomplish the following:
>> 1. Backport HADOOP-5836
>> 2. Update the jets3t library from 0.6.1 to 0.8.1. This entails code changes in the
s3n driver to track API changes in jets3t version 0.8.1. I filed a jira, HADOOP-8136, to track
this.
>> 
>> The question I have is this - where does it make sense to put these fixes in? Is
there a Release 1.1.0 planned? Or is it merely a 1.0.[23] type of change?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Jagane

--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/



Mime
View raw message