Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+ULb+uoEuivMBQhVsQi8A-O0WWaRwc0N19bssRg-WGww3w6ow@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+z3+9H1KtA47XyvNsjwgQLv=dW2mL+N50abt_wbksD__KkREA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+ULb+t_-Apbroy09C_fypmZhYpd_Yvjqj5GPq7tojV_wKNvbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+FBdFSZsXEtS3Gt1Nw1K0p7g=GiUU_SH39X_R_9N941+0On1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+ULb+uoEuivMBQhVsQi8A-O0WWaRwc0N19bssRg-WGww3w6ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Foley <mfoley@hortonworks.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:24:22 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+z3+9GJdLm0ie8cbde_CBnDcgrVrQBe2+K3fy3cm9wA=nEgBw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: cws@apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c7f37b374b504b3c2b11e

--0016364c7f37b374b504b3c2b11e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>> Btw, I think it is very instructive to take a look at how
Linux community has dealt
>> with version transition between 2.X -> 3.X.

You mean you want us to not call it 1.0.0?  As I remember the vote was
overwhelmingly
in favor of calling it 1.0.0.
--Matt

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashutosh@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hey Roman,
> >
> > That problem is at Hive end. You can try out the patch at
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2631 to unblock your testing.
>
> Btw, I think it is very instructive to take a look at how Linux
> community has dealt
> with version transition between 2.X -> 3.X. Here's a thread that I still
> have in
> my short term memory. There were, of course, others
>
> https://plus.google.com/106327083461132854143/posts/SbnL3KaVRtM#106327083461132854143/posts/SbnL3KaVRtM
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>

--0016364c7f37b374b504b3c2b11e--