Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 john@meebo-inc.com does not designate 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+4052kt=0URcZ9updLr5pREk+i3VqztEdY5P4Ov9Cgag8VKrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAEuK3PoiR-uriC4Z7N3pvkyKyaPJ+D4qrOiXec=4sggLqy-p+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+4052kt=0URcZ9updLr5pREk+i3VqztEdY5P4Ov9Cgag8VKrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Lee <john@meebo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:20:03 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAEuK3PpmharG6ZsG3bR2_zjLm_iwav9NaN5e3m67VTrvEzfuBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HADOOP-7021
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Aaron,

Thanks for advice, do you know if there are plans to eliminate the
warning messages from findbugs and javadoc?
The findbugs warnings are related to protocal buffer code and the
javadoc warnings are "Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a
future release" code.

John

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Aaron T. Myers <atm@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> If you're confident that the warnings are unrelated to the patch, just
> comment saying so on that JIRA and that will be fine.
>
> --
> Aaron T. Myers
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, John Lee <john@meebo-inc.com> wrote:
>
>> I recently resubmitted a patch for
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7021 and received -1
>> overall. When I took a look at what was the cause and it was due to
>> some findbugs warnings and javadoc warnings, which were unrelated to
>> the patch. Do these warnings need to be resolved before any new code
>> is committed to Hadoop Common?
>>
>