From common-dev-return-75872-apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive=hadoop.apache.org@hadoop.apache.org Tue Aug 2 20:33:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DA5E64F8 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96697 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2011 20:33:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96612 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2011 20:33:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 96604 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2011 20:33:42 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:33:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO awittena-md.linkedin.biz) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aw, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:33:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 0.20.204.0-rc0 From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:33:40 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1C21425D-A1EC-4FD9-B923-532538C795C6@apache.org> References: <6C8A17F4-97AB-497B-83CC-BB853E842C0E@hortonworks.com> <645195E6D08FFB4B9D81BB747CDF051B5A0F80@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com> <576E7EB3-3278-4A53-9482-CB8B3DAD6683@hortonworks.com> <4E3293BC.6040608@apache.org> <4E37DF66.2050109@apache.org> <10525873-1AA9-40D7-8F75-A3B3BC306004@apache.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > > However it is disappointing > to see some of the features being developed on branch-20-security, > rather being developed first on trunk and then ported to > branch-20-security. ... which was exactly my point.