hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arun C Murthy <...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release 0.20.204.0-rc0
Date Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:08:29 GMT
Thanks for the link Eli.

On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Eli Collins wrote:

> We've done both, even within a branch (0.20.0 was voted on core-dev@
> and 0.20.2 on general@).  The bylaws suggest general@ should be used,
> which seems to make sense since we're releasing common, hdfs and mr. I
> think either works as long as people know where to check.
> 
> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html
> 
> "Voting
> Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary
> project development mailing list (general@hadoop.apache.org)"
> 

IMO general@ isn't the primary 'development' mailing list - it's just an 'announcement' list.

But, it doesn't really matter... do folks feel strongly we should restart the vote on general?

Arun

> 
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Arun C Murthy <acm@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> In the past we've carried it out on common-dev:
>> http://hadoop-common.472056.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Hadoop-0-21-0-candidate-2-td1181981.html
>> 
>> Arun
>> 
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 5:33 PM, <Milind.Bhandarkar@emc.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Somehow I remember that the 0.20.203.0 vote was carried out on general@
>>> 
>>> Here is a message from the archive:
>>> 
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201105.mbox/browser
>>> 
>>> - milind
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> Milind Bhandarkar
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:acm@hortonworks.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 5:27 PM
>>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 0.20.204.0-rc0
>>> 
>>> Nope. general@ is only for announcements.
>>> 
>>> AFAIK Votes are developer activities.
>>> 
>>> Arun
>>> 
>>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Shouldn't this vote be taking place on general@, instead of common-dev@?
I'm
>>>> under the impression that that is where all votes are supposed to take
>>>> place. Please correct me if I am wrong about that.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Aaron T. Myers
>>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Giridharan Kesavan
>>>> <gkesavan@yahoo-inc.com>wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> This issue is fixed with Eric's patch for HADOOP-7356. Since Owen is
out on
>>>>> vacation Iam working on getting the release tarball.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Giri
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 7/28/11 1:56 PM, "Giridharan Kesavan" <gkesavan@yahoo-inc.com>
wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Myself and Eric Yang are looking into this.
>>>>>> -Giri
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 7/28/11 12:04 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" <awittenauer@linkedin.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 25, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I've created a release candidate for 0.20.204.0 that I would
like to
>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It is available at:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-0.20.204.0-rc0/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 0.20.204.0 has many fixes including disk fail in place and
the new rpm
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> deb packages. Fail in place allows the DataNode and TaskTracker
to
>>>>> continue
>>>>>>>> after a hard drive fails.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is it still failing to build according to Jenkins?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message