Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: Koji Noguchi <knoguchi@yahoo-inc.com>
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 11:22:07 -0700
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0
Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release candidate 0.20.203.0-rc0
Thread-Index: AcwJTOFGPqzW1TU7Sum3gLZV3TtxZwAciEVW
Message-ID: <C9E595DF.1A970%knoguchi@yahoo-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=qe5D+Bo_gVaOuOk2JNT5dbzPaPw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.9.0.110114
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

>> except
>> HADOOP-6386 and HADOOP-6428.
> causes a rolling port side effect in TT
>
I remember bugging Cos and Rob to revert HADOOP-6386.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6760?focusedCommentId=3D128673=
42&
page=3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#com=
men
t-12867342

Koji

On 5/2/11 9:43 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" <cos@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 16:56, Arun C Murthy <acm@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On May 2, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On May 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Tom White wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> I just did a quick search, and these are the JIRAs that are in 0.20.2
>>>> but appear not to be in 0.20.203.0.
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Thanks Tom.
>>>=20
>>> I did a quick analysis:
>>>=20
>>> # Remaining for 0.20.203
>>>  * HADOOP-5611
>>>  * HADOOP-5612
>>>  * HADOOP-5623
>>>  * HDFS-596
>>>  * HDFS-723
>>>  * HDFS-732
>>>  * HDFS-579
>>>  * MAPREDUCE-1070
>>>  * HADOOP-6315
>>>  * MAPREDUCE-1163
>>>  * HADOOP-5759
>>>  * HADOOP-6269
>>>  * HADOOP-6386
>>>  * HADOOP-6428
>>>=20
>>=20
>> Owen, Suresh and I have committed everything on this list except
>> HADOOP-6386 and HADOOP-6428. Not sure which of the two are
>> relevant/necessary, I'll check with Cos.  Other than that hadoop-0.20.20=
3
>> now a superset of hadoop-0.20.2.
>>=20
>=20
> I have looked somewhat more into these two JIRAs and if I remember correc=
tly
> this fix causes a rolling port side effect in TT and it has been reverted=
 in
> 0.20.200 (Y! Fred? release) because Ops weren't happy about this (I am su=
re
> you can check internal Git to cross-verify my recollection).
>=20
> Considering above, these might be better left outside of the release and,
> perhaps, they should be reverted in trunk as well.
>=20
> Cos
>=20
>=20
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>>=20