Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23461 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2010 12:11:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Apr 2010 12:11:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 83879 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:11:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83833 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2010 12:11:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 83825 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2010 12:11:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:11:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of diggerk@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.215] (HELO mail-ew0-f215.google.com) (209.85.219.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:11:29 +0000 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so936051ewy.31 for ; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:11:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rJPsLOs4jSsvG4AypiHFW7bLPx6zHKjwGU340KIfHN8=; b=Jq4MtWHrb4IiDwyfGD1TVeSTBGRx3FfL6r9loFPou2FQU9GN69raTOZKMVanHe7UVZ HyEIM7jFMut00sKIV2pR2emE+eMiJFPBR025CwxYp/ftPtry0qDSgQ67v9UVeNaxRirR OfvlldhVOc3ajCI8JOJKrAPwN2AbeePDTn8vc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RbY5vx0Jr0Qzqgc0i12dBqWR9k4g+7QIBt67LOYMxcOcDsKZLFL+HA3yyKeP2S5SEi DzINxBmNXT2GmrEeFEnOWoQVlcyGph2N3t0JkmfqOYYTEkZJtQH0jev4gYYjcxy4I9YB UFh+7yr7LtWpSirXacBnEM2DLGyXbz+NyTxy4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.33.70 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 05:11:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:11:06 +0400 Received: by 10.213.49.66 with SMTP id u2mr831596ebf.52.1270815066767; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: a patch for src/contrib/cloud scripts From: Andrew Klochkov To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485ea7a68a1426a0483ccb020 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485ea7a68a1426a0483ccb020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Tom White wrote: > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Andrew Klochkov wrote: > > > > And also I'm thinking if it's a good idea to create a "hardware" provider > to > > use cloud scripts for hardware (non-cloud) cluster deployment. What do > you > > think? Is there a better way to automate hardware cluster deployment? > > That would be a great addition. > Submitted it here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6696 But after I discovered Hadoop On Demand, I'm not sure it worth using contrib/cloud for hardware clusters deployment. So now I'm going to try HOD, and probably some configuration management tools like Chef or SmartFrog. -- Andrew Klochkov --001485ea7a68a1426a0483ccb020--