Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of awittenauer@linkedin.com
 designates 69.28.149.25 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
  h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:
   Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:
   Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:
   X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:user-agent:Content-Type:Content-ID:
   Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Return-Path:
   X-OriginalArrivalTime;
  b=tG/Pv63beUaK9MnBSRARiYJLMtz1lNSmBMe9sVWISHjd8cKkGn8AhqZG
   0797ayzYgVrUUSJYS4I/tW9MMPIQx0vKq7hQdzJELTsZpCdm1sWAnW3MN
   DGhVQJLDAAbJttf;
From: Allen Wittenauer <awittenauer@linkedin.com>
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process
Thread-Topic: [DISCUSSION] Release process
Thread-Index: 
 AcrEWa+RpVLt5MvFSP2+NdLg+MwrFQHJ3UZfABJ7twAABjligAEsLSQAAAnaUYAAAsy/gA==
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:42:49 +0000
Message-ID: <C7D88349.3EF7%awittenauer@linkedin.com>
In-Reply-To: <2B2FD090-DC7C-48A0-9569-994090C7B3FD@apache.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.4.0.100208
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <354df825-cd6a-4d49-9ec8-49bc065d7455>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


On 3/30/10 8:22 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <omalley@apache.org> wrote:

>=20
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>=20
>> Another release we might consider is 1.0 based on 0.20.
>=20
> It is tempting and I think that 0.20 is *really* our 1.0, but I think
> re-labeling a release a year after it came out would be confusing.

By "our" do you mean Yahoo!'s or Apache's?  The fact that there are a *ton*
of admin tool changes/fixes/additions in the Yahoo! Distribution of 0.20
(and quite a few in CDH) should be the big hint that Apache 0.20 is *not*
1.0.=20

I think it would do the PMC well to actually play with Apache 0.20.2 and
realize how much is missing vs. their in-house distributions.