hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2
Date Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:14:01 GMT
I don't think 101 is a real blocker - I haven't been able to reliably
produce it. HDFS-793 fixes most of the issues I've seen in practice, and we
now have a new patch in branch-20 which should fix that.

127 would be nice - there's a patch on that JIRA waiting for review as
below.

-Todd

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> If the new release included (fixedup) hdfs-127 and hdfs-101, the hbase
> crew would be big fans of an hadoop 0.20.2.
> St.Ack
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon <todd@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > HDFS-127 was originally committed, then rolled back from 0.20 as it
> caused
> > test timeouts due to infinite loop. I put a new patch up there but it has
> > not been reviewed, and thus not committed.
> >
> > Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.20.2 or can we hold out for these
> > patches?
> >
> > -Todd
> >
> > 2010/1/26 Kay Kay <kaykay.unique@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Is HDFS-127 going to be  part of it ? (seems to have been committed as
> per
> >> the jira).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any blockers
> >>>> that can't wait?
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Owen
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message