Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37405 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2009 15:32:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2009 15:32:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 44720 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2009 15:33:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-common-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44656 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2009 15:33:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact common-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 44646 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2009 15:33:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:33:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:32:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B5C1BA32B for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:32:30 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hpl.hp.com Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iNZuWkH5HGsx for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:32:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99081BA31F for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:32:29 +0100 (BST) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1250609537.65189@okhpGqRvbnBW6kk8UqluSg Received: from [16.25.175.158] (morzine.hpl.hp.com [16.25.175.158]) by 0-imap-br1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n7BFWGOU006518 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:32:17 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A818F00.3090401@apache.org> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:32:16 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Contributing a New FileSystem Implementation - Questions About Process References: <45f85f70908101335s547cf264t47489e66a47cbbff@mail.gmail.com> <1267dd3b0908101637m7acc6e76u5116c9970d47447a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: n7BFWGOU006518 X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jonathan Seidman wrote: > Thanks for the replies. We'll create a patch for trunk and then include a > 0.18 compatible patch with the Jira, as you suggest. > > Based on other contributed FileSystem implementations, we were assuming this > should go in o.a.h.fs and not contrib, so thanks for the clarification. > what's the test plan going to be for a new FS?