hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21
Date Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:45:24 GMT
+1 on Sept. 18th freeze date so there is time to get a working flush in
0.21.
St.Ack

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze <
s29752-hadoopdev@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I thought only Append needs more time.  If Map/Reduce also needs more time,
> +1 on Owen's proposal (i.e. everything on Sept 18.)
>
> Nicholas
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Hemanth Yamijala <yhemanth@yahoo-inc.com>
> > To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 8:42:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21
> >
> > Map/Reduce would benefit too from the extended date (Sept 18). I still
> > think Owen's latest proposal is more suitable.
> >
> > Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote:
> > >  seems that the Nigel's previous suggestion (i.e. append Sept 18,
> others Sept
> > 4) is better.
> > >
> > > For your reference, attached the previous message thread "[VOTE] Push
> back
> > code freeze for 0.21" at the end .
> > >
> > > Nicholas Sze
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >
> > >> From: Nigel Daley
> > >> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 2:23:24 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >> On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> All,
> > >>>   After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs
> more time
> >
> > >>>
> > >> to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze
> time of
> > 4:30
> > >> pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and
> MapReduce.
> > >>
> > >>> -- Owen
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> From: Eric Baldeschwieler
> > >> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 5:11:15 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
> > >>
> > >> AGGHH!
> > >>
> > >> Let's not push out the general freeze even as far as sept 4th if
> > >> possible.  I'd suggest oct 31st.  If we push out the general freeze
> > >> until append is complete, we will delay having a stable release with
> > >> append at least an additional month.
> > >>
> > >> E14
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> From: Nigel Daley
> > >>> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:30:55 -0700
> > >>> To:
> > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> There's a 3rd option I'd support.  Feature freeze on Sept 4, except
> > >>> for Append which gets a 2 week extension.  This allows us to start
> > >>> stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.
> > >>>
> > >>> Nige
> > >>>
> > >>> On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty
> > >>>> hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be
> > >>>> facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we
are
> > >>>> likely to need more time for the completion of the development
of
> > >>>> the code & tests.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Konstantin (aka Cos)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I would like to clarify the append plans.
> > >>>>> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
> > >>>>> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
> > >>>>> This will include all the functionality and unit testing
> > >>>>> according to the test plan.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features.
> > >>>>> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
> > >>>>> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster
than
> > >>>>> we predicted :-).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further
ahead.
> > >>>>> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with
the
> > >>>>> design.
> > >>>>> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing
using
> > >>>>> fault
> > >>>>> injection, etc.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> --Konstantin
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Amr Awadallah wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 for stable append.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -- amr
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman
> > >>>>>>> (POWERSET)  wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org]
> > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
> > >>>>>>>>> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze
back to 4
> > >>>>>>>>> September to
> > >>>>>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished
well. Clearly,
> > >>>>>>>>> I'm +1.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> -- Owen
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> With best regards,
> > >>>>       Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>        Yahoo! Grid Computing
> > >>>>        +1 (408) 349-4049
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> > >>>> Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ------ End of Forwarded Message
> > >>>
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >
> > >> From: Nigel Daley
> > >> To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 2:23:24 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >> On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> All,
> > >>>   After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs
> more time
> >
> > >>>
> > >> to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze
> time of
> > 4:30
> > >> pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and
> MapReduce.
> > >>
> > >>> -- Owen
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message