Mailing-List: contact core-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-Id: <5306B0B8-7CF7-4122-A975-35DA25D2B19F@cse.unl.edu>
From: Brian Bockelman <bbockelm@cse.unl.edu>
To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <C642EBFA.6C0D%scott@richrelevance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Subject: Re: 0.19.2 release needed
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:03:43 -0500
References: <C642EBFA.6C0D%scott@richrelevance.com>

Hey Scott,

We use 0.19.1 (plus some patches) heavily.  The other CMS sites use  
the same version -- represents about 600TB of user community :)

I'd be interested in seeing a 0.19.2 released.  I was kind of hoping  
lasting for a few months more on 0.19.x and then skip to 0.21.x prior  
to LHC startup.

Brian

On May 27, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Scott Carey wrote:

> Yes, my previous message is really a question as to the status of  
> the 0.19 branch in the community.
> If it is essentially dead, I'd like to know ASAP and figure out how  
> to migrate elsewhere soon.  If it has life left, it looks ripe for  
> another cut.
>
> Rolling backwards to 0.18 faces several problems., and its unclear  
> if 0.20 is better or worse than 0.19.1.
>
> Thanks All,
>
> -Scott
>
> On 5/27/09 12:49 PM, "Doug Cutting" <cutting@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Scott Carey wrote:
>> I would like to see a 0.19.2 release soon.
>
> Any committer can build a release candidate and call a release vote.
> Are there any committers sympathetic to Scott who would like to
> volunteer to drive the 0.19.2 release forward?  I think Y! skipped
> directly from 0.18 to 0.20, and so is less inclined to make 0.19  
> releases.
>
> Doug
>