hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5795) Add a bulk FIleSystem.getFileBlockLocations
Date Fri, 29 May 2009 00:38:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12714244#action_12714244
] 

dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-5795:
------------------------------------------

> Is there any other interface that resembles this?

The only thing that comes relatively close to this one is the READDIRPLUS operation in NFS.
This call is more like getFileStatusBulk() for HDFS.

> Add a bulk FIleSystem.getFileBlockLocations
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-5795
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5795
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: dfs
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.0
>            Reporter: Arun C Murthy
>            Assignee: Jakob Homan
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>
> Currently map-reduce applications (specifically file-based input-formats) use FileSystem.getFileBlockLocations
to compute splits. However they are forced to call it once per file.
> The downsides are multiple:
>    # Even with a few thousand files to process the number of RPCs quickly starts getting
noticeable
>    # The current implementation of getFileBlockLocations is too slow since each call
results in 'search' in the namesystem. Assuming a few thousand input files it results in that
many RPCs and 'searches'.
> It would be nice to have a FileSystem.getFileBlockLocations which can take in a directory,
and return the block-locations for all files in that directory. We could eliminate both the
per-file RPC and also the 'search' by a 'scan'.
> When I tested this for terasort, a moderate job with 8000 input files the runtime halved
from the current 8s to 4s. Clearly this is much more important for latency-sensitive applications...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message