Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28302 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2009 07:21:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2009 07:21:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 19389 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2009 07:21:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19196 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2009 07:21:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact core-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 19185 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2009 07:21:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:21:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:21:10 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF22F234C041 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <908555369.1236756050781.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:20:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5455) default "hadoop-metrics.properties" doesn't mention "dfs" context In-Reply-To: <1193797294.1236717890682.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12680772#action_12680772 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-5455: ----------------------------------- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12401859/HADOOP-5455.patch against trunk revision 752325. +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +0 tests included. The patch appears to be a documentation patch that doesn't require tests. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. +1 Eclipse classpath. The patch retains Eclipse classpath integrity. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests. +1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/68/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/68/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/68/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch-vesta.apache.org/68/console This message is automatically generated. > default "hadoop-metrics.properties" doesn't mention "dfs" context > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5455 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5455 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation, metrics > Reporter: Philip Zeyliger > Assignee: Philip Zeyliger > Priority: Minor > Attachments: HADOOP-5455.patch > > > The "hadoop-metrics.properties" file that's shipped in conf/ has configuration settings for the metrics contexts "dfs", "mapred", and "jvm". The (trivial) patch I'm proposing is to include default configuration for the "rpc" context as well. RPC metrics may be useful, and it's difficult for a user to intuit otherwise that rpc metrics even exist. (I stumbled upon them after exploring with JConsole and JMX.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.