Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87307 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2009 21:11:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2009 21:11:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 66824 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2009 21:11:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66769 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2009 21:11:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact core-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 66758 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2009 21:11:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:11:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:11:19 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C78234C4AF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:10:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <507443677.1231967459673.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:10:59 -0800 (PST) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-5023) Change hdfsproxy to use Tomcat instead of Jetty In-Reply-To: <1688599713.1231872239980.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12663886#action_12663886 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-5023: -------------------------------------- > 1. The embedded feature of Jetty is not required as hdfsproxy is intended as a standalone server. That's a reason Jetty isn't absolutely required, not a reason to use Tomcat. And are you certain that we'd never want to bundle the hdfsproxy with some other daemon? > 2. Tomcat has good production support at Yahoo, whereas Jetty doesn't. Can you elaborate on what "good production support" means? It seems reasonable to have an ant target that packages the hdfsproxy as a .war file that could be used in Tomcat. Is more than that required to satisfy this? > Change hdfsproxy to use Tomcat instead of Jetty > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5023 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5023 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/hdfsproxy > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: zhiyong zhang > > We plan to change hdfsproxy to use Tomcat instead of Jetty for the following reasons. > 1. The embedded feature of Jetty is not required as hdfsproxy is intended as a standalone server. > 2. Tomcat has good production support at Yahoo, whereas Jetty doesn't. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.