hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steve Loughran (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4365) Configuration.getProps() should be made protected for ease of overriding
Date Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:42:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12665825#action_12665825
] 

Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-4365:
----------------------------------------

I will add a test for this; catches regressions

> Configuration.getProps() should be made protected for ease of overriding
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-4365
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4365
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: conf
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Assignee: Steve Loughran
>         Attachments: hadoop-4365.patch
>
>
> HADOOP-4293 does make Configuration cleaner and easier to work with, but it does contain
assumptions about how configurations are represented (in a private Properties instance) that
subclasses may wish to diverge from.
> By making getProps() protected, people who subclass JobConf or Configuration can do their
own binding from configuration data to Properties. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message