Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31010 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2008 23:16:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2008 23:16:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 63016 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 23:16:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62986 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2008 23:16:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact core-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 62970 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2008 23:16:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:16:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:15:05 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56982234C247 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1640166054.1224717344353.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:15:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sanjay Radia (JIRA)" To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4348) Adding service-level authorization to Hadoop In-Reply-To: <1560154647.1223237144145.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641994#action_12641994 ] Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-4348: -------------------------------------- Doug do you mean the authorization will be checked on each method invokation? The problem is that the service authorization should be checked at the ipc layer rather then the rpc layer. The problem is that this patch stores a pointer to the authorization manager in the rpc layer (at rpc end-point creation time), It would be better to let the ipc layer store this pointer. Then everything would happen in the ipc layer which is the correct place to do it. > Adding service-level authorization to Hadoop > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4348 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4348 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Kan Zhang > Assignee: Arun C Murthy > Fix For: 0.20.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-4348_0_20081022.patch > > > Service-level authorization is the initial checking done by a Hadoop service to find out if a connecting client is a pre-defined user of that service. If not, the connection or service request will be declined. This feature allows services to limit access to a clearly defined group of users. For example, service-level authorization allows "world-readable" files on a HDFS cluster to be readable only by the pre-defined users of that cluster, not by anyone who can connect to the cluster. It also allows a M/R cluster to define its group of users so that only those users can submit jobs to it. > Here is an initial list of requirements I came up with. > 1. Users of a cluster is defined by a flat list of usernames and groups. A client is a user of the cluster if and only if her username is listed in the flat list or one of her groups is explicitly listed in the flat list. Nested groups are not supported. > 2. The flat list is stored in a conf file and pushed to every cluster node so that services can access them. > 3. Services will monitor the modification of the conf file periodically (5 mins interval by default) and reload the list if needed. > 4. Checking against the flat list is done as early as possible and before any other authorization checking. Both HDFS and M/R clusters will implement this feature. > 5. This feature can be switched off and is off by default. > I'm aware of interests in pulling user data from LDAP. For this JIRA, I suggest we implement it using a conf file. Additional data sources may be supported via new JIRA's. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.