Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51010 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2008 18:20:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2008 18:20:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10758 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2008 18:20:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10722 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2008 18:20:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact core-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10699 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2008 18:20:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:20:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:19:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970FF234C21D for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1124051018.1224526786617.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:19:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Raghu Angadi (JIRA)" To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4430) Namenode Web UI capacity report is inconsistent with Balancer In-Reply-To: <1079131676.1224179864791.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641094#action_12641094 ] Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-4430: -------------------------------------- What is the worst case possible if some one upgrades without noting the changes? > Namenode Web UI capacity report is inconsistent with Balancer > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-4430 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4430 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: dfs > Affects Versions: 0.19.0 > Reporter: Suresh Srinivas > Assignee: Suresh Srinivas > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.19.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-4430.patch, HADOOP-4430.patch, HADOOP-4430.patch > > > Solution to 2816 changed > - Total Capacity definition from (the disk space of all data directories) to (the disk space of all the data directories - the reserved space) > - We added a new element Present Capacity to the report. It is set to (Used Capacity + Remaining Capacity) > - We changed the Used Percentage reported from (Used Capacity)/(Total Capacity) to (Used Capacity)/(Present Capacity) > - All these changes are displayed on Namenode Web UI. > Balancer functionality > Balancer script is started with a threshold parameter. It tries to move the blocks from the nodes that have Used % that is more than (Cluster average + threshold) to the nodes that have less than (Cluster average - threshold). Essentially balancer gets all the datanodes used % to with in (the Cluster average +/- threshold). > Inconsistencies due to the change in 2816 > When MapReduce jobs are run, temporary files are generated. This eats away a lot of space from Present Capacity. The difference between the Total Capacity and the Present Capacity can be huge. Currently balancer computes Used Percentage based (Used Capacity)/(Total Capacity). The Used % the balancer uses could be significantly different from Used % displayed on the Namenode Web UI. When balancer is done balancing, the Namenode Used % might still appear unbalanced. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.