hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-3661) Normalize fuse-dfs handling of moving things to trash wrt the way hadoop dfs does it (only when non posix trash flag is enabled in compile)
Date Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:49:31 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12614946#action_12614946
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-3661:
-----------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12386452/patch1.txt
  against trunk revision 678080.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 8 new or modified tests.

    -1 patch.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2910/console

This message is automatically generated.

> Normalize fuse-dfs handling of moving things to trash wrt the way hadoop dfs does it
(only when non posix trash flag is enabled in compile)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3661
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3661
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/fuse-dfs
>            Reporter: Pete Wyckoff
>            Assignee: Pete Wyckoff
>         Attachments: patch0.txt, patch0.txt, patch1.txt, TEST-TestFuseDFS.txt
>
>
> Currently fuse-dfs is very crude about moving things to Trash. It can only move them
once since it doesn't use any numbering scheme to prevent overwrites.
> Should look at the code that hadoop dfs uses to move things to the trash and have the
same behavior, i think.
> Leaving it as major because it's pretty annoying and you can't tell what's wrong when
you get an EIO when deleting something.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message