Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1502 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2008 18:51:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jun 2008 18:51:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 9622 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2008 18:51:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-core-dev-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9592 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2008 18:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact core-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 9580 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2008 18:51:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:51:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:50:26 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7F8234C156 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <119368369.1214419845648.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:50:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-3637) Support for snapshots In-Reply-To: <721591721.1214353544996.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12608151#action_12608151 ] dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-3637: ------------------------------------------ Good question. I think a typical installation would have the namenode and secondary namenode in the same data center. So, in a disaster scenario, both of these machines might be unavailable. In short, a disaster recovery solution would need something more than the secondary namenode. I think that the request fr Joydeep is to transfer the snapshot image into a remote location (possibly outside the data center) so that it can allow namenode recovery after a disaster. One assumption for this recovery is that at at least one replica of most hdfs blocks be not affected by the disaster. > Support for snapshots > --------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-3637 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3637 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: dfs > Reporter: dhruba borthakur > Assignee: dhruba borthakur > > Support HDFS snapshots. It should support creating snapshots without shutting down the file system. Snapshot creation should be lightweight and a typical system should be able to support a few thousands concurrent snapshots. There should be a way to surface (i.e. mount) a few of these snapshots simultaneously. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.