hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "dhruba borthakur (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-3452) fsck exit code would be better if non-zero when FS corrupt
Date Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:12:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12602181#action_12602181
] 

dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-3452:
------------------------------------------

+1 code looks good. Is there a reason why we match the string "is CORRUPT" and not just "CORRUPT"?
If we are doing this on purpose, then the comment in the DFSck.java should mention that "is
CORRUPT" is the precise string that is being used.

> fsck exit code would be better if non-zero when FS corrupt
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3452
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3452
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: Pete Wyckoff
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.18.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-3452-1.patch, HADOOP-3452-2.patch
>
>
> fsck exit code would be better if behaved like other sys admin tools and exit code indicated
healthy/corrupt or other  errors.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message