hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christian Kunz (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-3392) Corrupted blocks leading to job failures
Date Wed, 14 May 2008 22:25:55 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Christian Kunz updated HADOOP-3392:
-----------------------------------

    Description: 
On one of our clusters we ended up with 11 singly-replicated corrupted blocks (checksum errors)
such that jobs were failing because of no live blocks available.

fsck reports the system as healthy, although it is not.

I argue that fsck should have an option to check whether under-replicated blocks are okay.

Even better, the namenode should automatically check under-replicated blocks with repeated
replication failures for corruption and list them somewhere on the GUI. And for checksum errors,
there should be an option to undo the corruption and recompute the checksums.

Question: Is it at all probable that two or more replications of a block have checksum errors?
If not, then we could reduce the checking to singly-replicated blocks.

  was:
On one of our clusters we ended up with 11 singly-replicated corrupted blocks (checksum errors)
such that jobs were failing because of no live blocks available.

fsck reports the system as healthy, although it is not.

I argue that fsck should have an option to check whether under-replicated blocks are okay.

Even better, the namenode should automatically check under-replicated blocks with repeated
replication failures for corruption and list them somewhere on the GUI. And there should be
an option to undo the corruption and recompute the checksums.

Question: Is it at all probable that two or more replications of a block have checksum errors?
If not, then we could reduce the checking to singly-replicated blocks.


> Corrupted blocks leading to job failures
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3392
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.16.0
>            Reporter: Christian Kunz
>
> On one of our clusters we ended up with 11 singly-replicated corrupted blocks (checksum
errors) such that jobs were failing because of no live blocks available.
> fsck reports the system as healthy, although it is not.
> I argue that fsck should have an option to check whether under-replicated blocks are
okay.
> Even better, the namenode should automatically check under-replicated blocks with repeated
replication failures for corruption and list them somewhere on the GUI. And for checksum errors,
there should be an option to undo the corruption and recompute the checksums.
> Question: Is it at all probable that two or more replications of a block have checksum
errors? If not, then we could reduce the checking to singly-replicated blocks.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message