hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-2585) Automatic namespace recovery from the secondary image.
Date Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:48:04 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Konstantin Shvachko updated HADOOP-2585:
----------------------------------------

    Attachment: SecondaryStorage.patch

This is a new patch that
# does not contain code that was fixed in HADOOP-3069;
# fixes findbugs from the previous run;
# fixes TestCheckpoint failure.

The letter was tricky. TestCheckpoint failed on Hudson but not on any of other machines I
tested it. The failure is related to that when the name-node started it did not get an exclusive
lock for its storage directory as required. I initially suspected that this is a Solaris problem,
but later realized that it is a NFS problem, which may not support exclusive locks consistently.
IMO we should enforce exclusivity of locks only if it is supported by a local file system.
So the test now checks whether exclusive locks are supported before failing.

> Automatic namespace recovery from the secondary image.
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-2585
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2585
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: dfs
>    Affects Versions: 0.16.0
>            Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>            Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
>         Attachments: SecondaryStorage.patch, SecondaryStorage.patch
>
>
> Hadoop has a three way (configuration controlled) protection from loosing the namespace
image.
> # image can be replicated on different hard-drives of the same node;
> # image can be replicated on a nfs mounted drive on an independent node;
> # a stale replica of the image is created during periodic checkpointing and stored on
the secondary name-node.
> Currently during startup the name-node examines all configured storage directories, selects
the
> most up to date image, reads it, merges with the corresponding edits, and writes to the
new image back 
> into all storage directories. Everything is done automatically.
> If due to multiple hardware failures none of those images on mounted hard drives (local
or remote) 
> are available the secondary image although stale (up to one hour old by default) can
be still 
> used in order to recover the majority of the file system data.
> Currently one can reconstruct a valid name-node image from the secondary one manually.
> It would be nice to support an automatic recovery.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message