Mailing-List: contact core-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Message-ID: <935370009.1206747626410.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Nigel Daley (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: core-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-3128) TestDFSPermission due to not
 throwing exception.
In-Reply-To: <2077573438.1206745344187.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12583239#action_12583239 ] 

Nigel Daley commented on HADOOP-3128:
-------------------------------------

>From test-patch:

     [exec] -1 overall.
     [exec]
     [exec]     @author +1.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
     [exec]
     [exec]     tests included -1.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests.
     [exec]                         Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch.
     [exec]
     [exec]     javadoc +1.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
     [exec]
     [exec]     javac +1.  The applied patch does not generate any new javac compiler warnings.
     [exec]
     [exec]     findbugs +1.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

An existing test caught this problem: TestDFSPermission


> TestDFSPermission due to not throwing exception.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3128
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3128
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>    Affects Versions: 0.16.2
>            Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
>            Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
>             Fix For: 0.16.2
>
>         Attachments: TestDFSPermission.patch
>
>
> This is the consequence of HADOOP-3108.
> setPermission nad setOwner should throw RemoteException if it is not FileNotFoundException.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.