hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward Yoon (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-993) Namenode does not need to store any data node info persistently.
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:36:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576019#action_12576019

Edward Yoon commented on HADOOP-993:

>> "in case of a misconfiguration of a datanode, namenode can tell which datanode "should"
have a certain storageid" - You might be right here. But from my understanding, we have never
had exploited this particular feature on our kryptonite cluster till now. 

Is kryptonite a cluster patronized by yahoo employee ?

> Namenode does not need to store any data node info persistently.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-993
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-993
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: Raghu Angadi
>            Assignee: Sameer Paranjpye
>         Attachments: noDatanodesInFsimage.patch
> Namenode does not need to serialize datanode info. It will map datanode to storageID
when datanode register.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message