hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward Yoon (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-993) Namenode does not need to store any data node info persistently.
Date Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:36:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576019#action_12576019
] 

Edward Yoon commented on HADOOP-993:
------------------------------------

>> "in case of a misconfiguration of a datanode, namenode can tell which datanode "should"
have a certain storageid" - You might be right here. But from my understanding, we have never
had exploited this particular feature on our kryptonite cluster till now. 

Is kryptonite a cluster patronized by yahoo employee ?

> Namenode does not need to store any data node info persistently.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-993
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-993
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: Raghu Angadi
>            Assignee: Sameer Paranjpye
>         Attachments: noDatanodesInFsimage.patch
>
>
> Namenode does not need to serialize datanode info. It will map datanode to storageID
when datanode register.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message