hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-2559) DFS should place one replica per rack
Date Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:28:24 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12579586#action_12579586
] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-2559:
-----------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12378053/HADOOP-2559-1-4.patch
against trunk revision 619744.

    @author +1.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    tests included +1.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

    javadoc +1.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    javac +1.  The applied patch does not generate any new javac compiler warnings.

    release audit +1.  The applied patch does not generate any new release audit warnings.

    findbugs +1.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

    core tests -1.  The patch failed core unit tests.

    contrib tests +1.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1984/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1984/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1984/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1984/console

This message is automatically generated.

> DFS should place one replica per rack
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-2559
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2559
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: Runping Qi
>            Assignee: lohit vijayarenu
>         Attachments: HADOOP-2559-1-2.patch, HADOOP-2559-1-3.patch, HADOOP-2559-1-4.patch,
HADOOP-2559-1.patch, HADOOP-2559-1.patch, HADOOP-2559-2.patch, Patch1_Block_Report.png.jpg,
Patch1_Rack_Node_Mapping.jpg, Patch2 Block Report.jpg, Patch2_Rack_Node_Mapping.jpg, Trunk_Block_Report.png,
Trunk_Rack_Node_Mapping.jpg
>
>
> Currently, when writing out a block, dfs will place one copy to a local data node, one
copy to a rack local node
> and another one to a remote node. This leads to a number of undesired properties:
> 1. The block will be rack-local to two tacks instead of three, reducing the advantage
of rack locality based scheduling by 1/3.
> 2. The Blocks of a file (especiallya  large file) are unevenly distributed over the nodes:
One third will be on the local node, and two thirds on the nodes on the same rack. This may
make some nodes full much faster than others, 
> increasing the need of rebalancing. Furthermore, this also make some nodes become "hot
spots" if those big 
> files are popular and accessed by many applications.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message