hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-2576) Namenode performance degradation over time
Date Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:59:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12562576#action_12562576

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-2576:

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
against trunk revision 614721.

    @author +1.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    javadoc +1.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    javac +1.  The applied patch does not generate any new compiler warnings.

    findbugs -1.  The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs warnings.

    core tests +1.  The patch passed core unit tests.

    contrib tests +1.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1677/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1677/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1677/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1677/console

This message is automatically generated.

> Namenode performance degradation over time
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-2576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2576
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>    Affects Versions: 0.16.0
>            Reporter: Christian Kunz
>            Assignee: Raghu Angadi
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.16.0
>         Attachments: HADOOP-2576.patch, HADOOP-2576.patch, HADOOP-2576.patch
> We have a cluster running the same applications again and again with a high turnover
of files.
> The performance of these applications seem to be correlated to the lifetime of the namenode:
> After starting the namenode, the applications need increasingly more time to complete,
with about 50% more time after 1 week. 
> During that time the namenode average cpu usage increases from typically 10% to 30%,
memory usage nearly doubles (although the average amount of data on dfs stays the same), and
the average load factor increases by a factor of 2-3 (although not  significantly high, <2).
> When looking at the namenode and datanode logs, I see a lot of asks to delete blocks
coming from the namenode for blocks not in the blockmap of the datanodes, repeatedly for the
same blocks.
> When I counted the number of blocks asked by the namenode to be deleted, I noticed a
noticeable increase with the lifetime of the namenode (a factor of 2-3 after 1 week).
> This makes me wonder whether the namenode does not purge the list of invalid blocks from
non-existing blocks.
> But independently, the namenode has a degradation issue.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message