Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 87945 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2007 01:55:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2007 01:55:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 94926 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2007 01:54:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 94896 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2007 01:54:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 94848 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2007 01:54:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:54:54 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:54:42 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AAA71422E for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:54:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <29775660.1196474084094.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:54:44 -0800 (PST) From: "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-2323) JobTracker.close() prints stack traces for exceptions that are not errors In-Reply-To: <910797.1196462803398.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547362 ] Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-2323: ----------------------------------- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12370714/patch.txt against trunk revision r599951. @author +1. The patch does not contain any @author tags. javadoc +1. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. javac +1. The applied patch does not generate any new compiler warnings. findbugs +1. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings. core tests +1. The patch passed core unit tests. contrib tests +1. The patch passed contrib unit tests. Test results: http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1223/testReport/ Findbugs warnings: http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1223/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Checkstyle results: http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1223/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html Console output: http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/1223/console This message is automatically generated. > JobTracker.close() prints stack traces for exceptions that are not errors > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-2323 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2323 > Project: Hadoop > Issue Type: Bug > Components: mapred > Affects Versions: 0.16.0 > Reporter: Jim Kellerman > Assignee: Jim Kellerman > Fix For: 0.16.0 > > Attachments: patch.txt > > > JobTracker.close() prints a stack trace for an interrupted exception even though it was the method that interrupted the thread that threw the exception. For example: > {code} > this.expireTrackers.stopTracker(); > try { > this.expireTrackersThread.interrupt(); > this.expireTrackersThread.join(); > } catch (InterruptedException ex) { > ex.printStackTrace(); > } > {code} > Well of course it is going to catch an InterruptedException after it just interrupted the thread! > This is *not* an error and should *not* be dumped to the logs! > In other circumstances, catching InterruptedException is entirely appropriate. Just not in close where you've told the thread to shutdown and then interrupted it to ensure it does! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.