hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-1845) Datanodes get error message "is valid, and cannot be written to"
Date Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:21:29 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526229

Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-1845:

This looks like a recent addition. Could you guys post with which versions of hadoop you can/started
to see that behavior
so that we could track what could have caused it.

> Datanodes get error message "is valid, and cannot be written to" 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-1845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1845
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>    Affects Versions: 0.14.1
>            Reporter: Hairong Kuang
>             Fix For: 0.15.0
> >> Copy from dev list:
> Our cluster has 4 nodes and i set the mapred.subimt.replication parameter to 2 on all
nodes and the master. Everything has been restarted.
> Unfortuantely, we still have the same exception :
> 2007-09-05 17:01:59,623 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode:
> DataXceiver: java.io.IOException: Block blk_-5969983648201186681 is valid, and cannot
be written to.
>         at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSDataset.writeToBlock(FSDataset.java:515)
>         at
> org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$DataXceiver.writeBlock(DataNode.java:822)
>         at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DataNode$DataXceiver.run(DataNode.java:727)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
> >> end of copy
> The message shows that the namenode schedules to replicate a block to a datanode that
already holds the block. The namenode block placement algorithm makes sure that it does not
schedule a block to a datanode that is confirmed to hold a replica of the block. But it is
not aware of any in-transit  block placements (i.e. the scheduled but not confirmed block
placements), so occasionally we may still see "is valid, and cannot be written to" errors.
> A fix to the problem is to keep track of all in-transit block  placements, and the block
placement algorithm considers these  to-be-confirmed replicas as well.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message