On 18.07.2007, at 11:06, Devaraj Das wrote:
> Came across this link: http://www.slf4j.org/index.html. Got me
> interested
> since it makes a remark "SLF4J suffers from none of the class loader
> problems or memory leaks observed with Jakarta Commons Logging
> (JCL).". Is
> it true that the version of commons-logging we use in hadoop could
> have
> issues to do with memory leaks? If so, we should consider moving to
> SLF4J
> unless there are other issues. There is a well-defined migration
> path -
> http://www.slf4j.org/manual.html#gradual
>
There have been a few releases since then addressing most of the
problems listed. If you are really concerned I suggest to make sure
you use the latest version and check on the commons dev list if you
have questions.
cheers
--
Torsten
|