Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 56182 invoked from network); 8 May 2007 11:15:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 May 2007 11:15:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 32254 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2007 11:15:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 31972 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2007 11:15:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 31956 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2007 11:15:42 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 May 2007 04:15:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 May 2007 04:15:35 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0D7714062 for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 04:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1726445.1178622915504.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 04:15:15 -0700 (PDT) From: "Devaraj Das (JIRA)" To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-1337) Each shuffle should proceed as a DFA In-Reply-To: <19862168.1178604615319.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494250 ] Devaraj Das commented on HADOOP-1337: ------------------------------------- Made this a minor issue since the shuffle code does not have known issues as-of-date. However, the DFA probably is the ideal model to go after. > Each shuffle should proceed as a DFA > ------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-1337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1337 > Project: Hadoop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: mapred > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Priority: Minor > > The shuffle code (for fetching map outputs) should proceed as a DFA. The states (as Owen had mentioned on HADOOP-1183) are (INITIAL, LOCATED, FETCHING, DONE, FAILED). This is to ensure correctness of map output fetching. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.