Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 14995 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2007 20:45:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2007 20:45:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 58086 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2007 20:46:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 57889 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2007 20:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 57880 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2007 20:46:00 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:46:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.133.162.107] (HELO linuxfly.dragonflymc.com) (63.133.162.107) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:45:50 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.246] (bigfly.visvo.com [192.168.1.246]) by linuxfly.dragonflymc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC039C20028 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:45:25 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <45F70D65.3070802@dragonflymc.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:45:25 -0500 From: Dennis Kubes User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 0.12.1 release plan References: <45F19E1C.5020609@apache.org> <45F6FCEF.5070602@dragonflymc.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nigel Daley wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > If you go to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP and click on > 0.12.1 you'll see that HADOOP-1115 is already assigned to 0.12.1 > release. You can also see the other uncommitted defects that are > assigned to this release. > > hth, > Nige Excellent. Thanks. > > On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Dennis Kubes wrote: > >> Can we get the new HADOOP-1115 included in this release? This would >> really help with allowing Nutch to use 0.12.1 as opposed to the older >> 0.11.x release >> >> Dennis Kubes >> >> Nigel Daley wrote: >>> A number of additional 0.12.1 blockers have come up and have patches >>> available for them. However, a fix for HADOOP-1093 is still >>> pending. In light of this, I'm pushing Hadoop 0.12.1 release out 1 >>> more day to tomorrow, Wednesday, March 14. >>> Cheers, >>> Nige >>> On Mar 12, 2007, at 2:42 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >>>> A fix for HADOOP-1093 is still pending. The fix for HADOOP-1091 >>>> failed and a new fix is pending. In light of these, I've >>>> rescheduled Hadoop 0.12.1 to tomorrow, Tuesday, March 13. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nige >>>> >>>> On Mar 9, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've pushed out the release date for 0.12.1 to Monday. With recent >>>>> patches, stability is looking a lot better, but there are still a >>>>> few blocker issues. My hope is 0.12.1 will be a stable release >>>>> that, e.g., Nutch can confidently integrate into its upcoming 0.9 >>>>> release. >>>>> >>>>> Trunk currently contains only changes for 0.12.1. No 0.13.0 >>>>> changes have yet been committed. Let's hold off committing those >>>>> until 0.12.1 is out the door, okay? >>>>> >>>>> Doug >>>> >