Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 46843 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2007 00:33:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2007 00:33:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 16950 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2007 00:33:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 16926 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2007 00:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 16917 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2007 00:33:27 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:33:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.44.16.11] (HELO getopt.org) (69.44.16.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:33:15 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.252] (75-mo3-2.acn.waw.pl [62.121.105.75]) (authenticated) by getopt.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l2A0XCK12758 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:33:12 -0600 Message-ID: <45F1FCC0.6000603@getopt.org> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:33:04 +0100 From: Andrzej Bialecki User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: 0.12.1 release plan References: <45F19E1C.5020609@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <45F19E1C.5020609@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > I've pushed out the release date for 0.12.1 to Monday. With recent > patches, stability is looking a lot better, but there are still a few > blocker issues. My hope is 0.12.1 will be a stable release that, > e.g., Nutch can confidently integrate into its upcoming 0.9 release. Actually we discussed this on the Nutch mailing list, and the overall consensus was that for this release we should stick to 0.11.2, since 0.12 still looks too fresh. Do you think we should revisit this issue? -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com