Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 35925 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2007 19:59:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Mar 2007 19:59:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 16986 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2007 20:00:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 16957 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2007 20:00:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 16948 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2007 20:00:01 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:00:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:59:53 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27739714064 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20365987.1174939172134.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:59:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Created: (HADOOP-1161) need improved release process MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org need improved release process ----------------------------- Key: HADOOP-1161 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1161 Project: Hadoop Issue Type: Improvement Components: build Reporter: Doug Cutting Fix For: 0.13.0 Hadoop's release process needs improvement. We should better ensure that releases are stable, not releasing versions that have not been proven stable on large clusters, and we should better observe Apache's release procedures. Once agreed on, this process should be documented in http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-hadoop/HowToRelease. Here's a proposal: . candidate release builds should be placed in lucene.apache.org/hadoop/dev/dist . candidate artifacts should be accompanied by a md5 and pgp signatures . a 72-hour vote for the release artifact should be called on hadoop-dev. . 3 binding +1 votes and a majority are required . if the vote passes, the release can then posted to www.apache.org/dist/lucene/hadoop for mirroring This would bring us into accord with Apache's requirements, and better permit large-cluster validation. We should also build consensus for a release before we commence this process. Perhaps we should aim for releases every two months instead of every month. We should perhaps develop more elaborate branching and merging conventions around releases. Currently we mostly lock-out changes intended for release X+1 from trunk until release X is complete, which can be awkward. How can we better manage that? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.