Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 74869 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2007 19:57:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2007 19:57:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 13180 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2007 19:57:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13159 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2007 19:57:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13150 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2007 19:57:48 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:57:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of tom.e.white@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.235 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.235] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.235) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:57:39 -0800 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i1so909118nzh for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:57:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uHBOl9jYgW7NvULF/3KBZRuYdgogv65OnQhF7ZFWwhrYbVB41LNrsom7+sajQmksvhwlIWd2ysdbQw9xf+/xIIGq6bVu3ukh6RxcX0UvtVU7pvIPWVWur9kk2sQyt5jb2AAs+WeOyF6/0YDZik791Ai7kcMWtgSlvZHyDRCL4qI= Received: by 10.115.106.7 with SMTP id i7mr6327461wam.1171051038003; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:57:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.13.13 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:57:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:57:17 +0000 From: "Tom White" To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-882) S3FileSystem should retry if there is a communication problem with S3 In-Reply-To: <9EEC67AB-E096-4D73-9228-0A5A95B4D16C@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <11369582.1170973626084.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <9B8109E4-4410-4A2B-913D-D75642015EEB@yahoo-inc.com> <45CCC0C7.4080805@apache.org> <9EEC67AB-E096-4D73-9228-0A5A95B4D16C@yahoo-inc.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nigel, Is there any way we can see the failure message from Hadoop QA? I agree that this case is a false alarm and is ready to be committed. On 09/02/07, Nigel Daley wrote: > Oops, my bad. Ya, there are two s3 unit tests run: > org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.TestINode > org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3.TestInMemoryS3FileSystem > > On Feb 9, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > Nigel Daley wrote: > >> FWIW, the unit tests run by Hadoop QA are not relevant for this > >> patch since none of the s3 unit tests are run. The -1 from Hadoop > >> QA can be ignored. > > > > None? Really? Doesn't it run all the tests that 'ant test' runs? > > > > Doug > >