Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <24305444.1172010306130.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:25:06 -0800 (PST)
From: "Wendy Chien (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Assigned: (HADOOP-564) we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs
In-Reply-To: <8791585.1159415030129.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Wendy Chien reassigned HADOOP-564:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Wendy Chien  (was: Sameer Paranjpye)

> we should use hdfs:// in all API URIs
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-564
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler
>         Assigned To: Wendy Chien
>
> Minor nit, but it seems that we should choose a protocol name that is likely not to conflict with other distributed FS projects.  HDFS seems less likely to.  
> Right now this will be trivial to change.  Just wanted to socialize this before doing the search and replace.  
> PS right now the dfs: usage is not consistent and has crept into a couple of new features the y! team is working on (caching of files and distcp).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.