Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <20889898.1170451445685.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:24:05 -0800 (PST)
From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-893) dead datanode set should be
 maintained in the file handle or file system for hdfs
In-Reply-To: <4726668.1168972827510.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469876 ] 

Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-893:
-------------------------------------

This patch conflicts with HADOOP-692.  Which should take priority?

> dead datanode set should be maintained in the file handle or file system for hdfs
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-893
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-893
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>         Assigned To: Raghu Angadi
>         Attachments: HADOOP-893-1.patch, HADOOP-893-2.patch
>
>
> Currently each call to read is creating a new set of dead datanodes. It seems like it would be more useful to keep a set of dead datanodes at either the file handle or file system level since dead datanodes are probably not quite that transient.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.