Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <15073106.1171388166167.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:36:06 -0800 (PST)
From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (HADOOP-1014) map/reduce is corrupting data between
 map and reduce
In-Reply-To: <9774765.1171343045516.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-1014:
---------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 0.11.2

This warrants a point release.  I've scheduled one for this Friday, hoping we find a fix by then.

> map/reduce is corrupting data between map and reduce
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-1014
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1014
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: mapred
>    Affects Versions: 0.11.1
>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>         Assigned To: Devaraj Das
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.11.2
>
>
> It appears that a random data corruption is happening between the map and the reduce. This looks to be a blocker until it is resolved. There were two relevant messages on hadoop-dev:
> from Mike Smith:
> The map/reduce jobs are not consistent in hadoop 0.11 release and trunk both
> when you rerun the same job. I have observed this inconsistency of the map
> output in different jobs. A simple test to double check is to use hadoop
> 0.11 with nutch trunk.
> from Albert Chern:
> I am having the same problem with my own map reduce jobs.  I have a job
> which requires two pieces of data per key, and just as a sanity check I make
> sure that it gets both in the reducer, but sometimes it doesn't.  What's
> even stranger is, the same tasks that complain about missing key/value pairs
> will maybe fail two or three times, but then succeed on a subsequent try,
> which leads me to believe that the bug has to do with randomization (I'm not
> sure, but I think the map outputs are shuffled?).
> All of my code works perfectly with 0.9, so I went back and just compared
> the sizes of the outputs.  For some jobs, the outputs from 0.11 were
> consistently 4 bytes larger, probably due to changes in SequenceFile.  But
> for others, the output sizes were all over the place.  Some partitions were
> empty, some were correct, and some were missing data.  There seems to be
> something seriously wrong with 0.11, so I suggest you use 0.9.  I've been
> trying to pinpoint the bug but its random nature is really annoying.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.