hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nigel Daley <nda...@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-893) dead datanode set should be maintained in the file handle or file system for hdfs
Date Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:27:43 GMT
This patch hasn't been code reviewed.  692 should take priority.


On Feb 2, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Doug Cutting (JIRA) wrote:

>
>     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-893? 
> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- 
> tabpanel#action_12469876 ]
>
> Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-893:
> -------------------------------------
>
> This patch conflicts with HADOOP-692.  Which should take priority?
>
>> dead datanode set should be maintained in the file handle or file  
>> system for hdfs
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ------------
>>
>>                 Key: HADOOP-893
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-893
>>             Project: Hadoop
>>          Issue Type: Bug
>>          Components: dfs
>>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>>         Assigned To: Raghu Angadi
>>         Attachments: HADOOP-893-1.patch, HADOOP-893-2.patch
>>
>>
>> Currently each call to read is creating a new set of dead  
>> datanodes. It seems like it would be more useful to keep a set of  
>> dead datanodes at either the file handle or file system level  
>> since dead datanodes are probably not quite that transient.
>
> -- 
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>


Mime
View raw message