hadoop-common-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-928) make checksums optional per FileSystem
Date Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:32:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476239
] 

Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-928:
-------------------------------------

One more thing: the sum file buffer should also be kept small, probably to the default (io.file.buffer.size).
 Currently the patch passes the bufferSize parameter there, rather than letting it default.

> make checksums optional per FileSystem
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-928
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-928
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fs
>            Reporter: Doug Cutting
>         Assigned To: Hairong Kuang
>         Attachments: checksum.patch, checksum1.patch, checksum2.patch
>
>
> Checksumming is currently built into the base FileSystem class.  It should instead be
optional, with each FileSystem implementation electing whether to use the Hadoop-provided
checksum system, or to disable it, or to implement its own custom checksum system.
> To implement this, a ChecksumFileSystem implementation can be provided that wraps another
FileSystem implementation, implementing checksums as in Hadoop's current mandatory implementation
(i.e., as a separate crc file per file that's elided from directory listings).  The 'raw'
FileSystem methods would be removed.  FSDataInputStream and FSDataOutputStream would be made
interfaces.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message