Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 44065 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2006 20:48:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2006 20:48:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 95652 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2006 20:48:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-hadoop-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95428 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2006 20:48:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hadoop-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95419 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2006 20:48:13 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:48:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:48:01 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7231714312 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:47:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17478123.1163191661682.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:47:41 -0800 (PST) From: "Doug Cutting (JIRA)" To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-489) Seperating user logs from system logs in map reduce In-Reply-To: <30146384.1156876403539.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-489?page=comments#action_12448850 ] Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-489: ------------------------------------- This looks great. Two minor changes I'd like to see: 1. I can see no reason why TaskLog needs to be public. It should be package-private. 2. 'ant test' creates a 'userlog' directory in the connected directory that is not removed. This should instead be created in build/test, no? (The 'history' directory is also created, but that is not introduced by this patch.) > Seperating user logs from system logs in map reduce > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-489 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-489 > Project: Hadoop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: mapred > Reporter: Mahadev konar > Assigned To: Arun C Murthy > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 0.9.0 > > Attachments: HADOOP-489_20061019.patch, HADOOP-489_20061101.patch, HADOOP-489_20061102.patch, HADOOP-489_20061107.patch, HADOOP-489_20061109.patch > > > Currently the user logs are a part of system logs in mapreduce. Anything logged by the user is logged into the tasktracker log files. This create two issues- > 1) The system log files get cluttered with user output. If the user outputs a large amount of logs, the system logs need to be cleaned up pretty often. > 2) For the user, it is difficult to get to each of the machines and look for the logs his/her job might have generated. > I am proposing three solutions to the problem. All of them have issues with it - > Solution 1. > Output the user logs on the user screen as part of the job submission process. > Merits- > This will prevent users from printing large amount of logs and the user can get runtime feedback on what is wrong with his/her job. > Issues - > This proposal will use the framework bandwidth while running jobs for the user. The user logs will need to pass from the tasks to the tasktrackers, from the tasktrackers to the jobtrackers and then from the jobtrackers to the jobclient using a lot of framework bandwidth if the user is printing out too much data. > Solution 2. > Output the user logs onto a dfs directory and then concatenate these files. Each task can create a file for the output in the log direcotyr for a given user and jobid. > Issues - > This will create a huge amount of small files in DFS which later can be concatenated into a single file. Also there is this issue that who would concatenate these files into a single file? This could be done by the framework (jobtracker) as part of the cleanup for the jobs - might stress the jobtracker. > > Solution 3. > Put the user logs into a seperate user log file in the log directory on each tasktrackers. We can provide some tools to query these local log files. We could have commands like for jobid j and for taskid t get me the user log output. These tools could run as a seperate map reduce program with each map grepping the user log files and a single recude aggregating these logs in to a single dfs file. > Issues- > This does sound like more work for the user. Also, the output might not be complete since a tasktracker might have went down after it ran the job. > Any thoughts? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira